Tags
Analytical method used by laboratory that analyzed the sample.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Sample number given at time of collection.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Alternate sample ID ex. museum number, lab number, etc.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Records map unit to which this analysis or observation pertains. Foreign key to DescriptionOfMapUnits table.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Symbology reference code assigned to the feature. Can either be FGDC Geologic Map Symbolization or to the accompanying .style file in the publication.
Federal Geographic Data Committee, Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization, 2006
A unique number assigned to the sample for cartographic purposes e.g., G1, G2, G3, etc.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Radius (in meters) of positional-uncertainty envelope around this point feature.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Denominator of smallest map scale at which this point feature should be plotted on map (that is, it should not be plotted at smaller map scales).
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
The USGS 7.5' quadrangle in which the sample is located.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Elevation of sample location in feet above sea level.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Identifies material that was analyzed.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Rock name assigned based on the total alkalis (Na2O + K2O) versus silica (SiO2) diagram (TAS) of Le Bas and others (1986), Le Bas and Streckeisen (1991), and Le Maitre and others (1989).
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Silica oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Aluminum oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Titanium oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Total iron oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Manganese(II) oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Calcium oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Magnesium oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Potassium oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Sodium oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Phosphorus pentoxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Nickel listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Chromium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Scandium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Vanadium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Barium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Rubidium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Strontium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Zirconium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Yttrium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Niobium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Gallium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Copper listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Zinc listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Lead listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Lanthanum listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Cerium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Thorium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Neodymium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Uranium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Cesium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Cobalt listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Hafnium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Samarium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Europium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Ytterbium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Lutetium listed as parts per million.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Value for loss on ignition as reported by lab.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Original analytical total.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Iron (III) oxide or ferric oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Iron (II) oxide or ferrous oxide listed as weight percent.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Meters north in NAD 27 UTM projection.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Meters east in NAD 27 UTM projection.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Latitude in NAD 27 geographic coordinates.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Longitude in NAD 27 geographic coordinates.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Meters north in NAD 83 UTM projection.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Meters east in NAD 83 UTM projection.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Latitude in NAD 83 geographic coordinates.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Longitude in NAD 83 geographic coordinates.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Feet north in Oregon Lambert NAD 83, HARN, international feet. Used by Oregon agencies for publishing State-wide spatial data in a single projected system.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Feet east in Oregon Lambert NAD 83, HARN, international feet. Used by Oregon agencies for publishing State-wide spatial data in a single projected system.
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Identifies source of location of this feature. Foreign key to DataSources table.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Identifies source of analytical data for this sample. Foreign key to DataSources table.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Additional information specific to a particular feature or table entry.
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
Primary key. Values GCM1, GCM2, GCM3, .. Null values not permitted
U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)
This point feature class records locations of samples collected for geochchemical analysis, as well as the associated chemical analyses.
New and compiled geochemical analyses are provided as a GIS feature class within a GeMS file geodatabase, a simple shapefile, and as an open spreadsheet. Descriptive rock unit names for igneous rocks are based on normalized major element analyses plotted on the total alkalis (Na2O + K2O) versus silica (SiO2) diagram (TAS). This feature class does not have FGDC cartographic representations associated with its features. Cartographic representation can be applied from the accompanying .style file. This point feature class records locations of samples collected for geochchemical analysis, as well as the associated chemical analyses.
The purpose of this GeMS file geodatabase is the storage and management of the geospatial data of the geologic information in the Athena 1:24,000-scale quadrangle, Umatilla County. This file geodatabase was compiled to construct a geologic map of the Athena 1:24,000-scale quadrangle, Umatilla County, Oregon, and it is this map that is a deliverable for U.S. Geological Survey STATEMAP program. This is a GeMS file geodatabase with cartographic representation and the central storage location for features and associated tables. The features and tables contain 1:24,000-scale geologic map data of Athena 7.5′ quadrangle, Umatilla County, Oregon. At the core of this product is the U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Map Schema (GeMS) file geodatabase incorporating FGDC standard schema for digital geologic map data. The storage location for features is GeologicMap dataset and with additional attributes in associated tables.
None
MAP DATA: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication.
When contacting DOGAMI about this data set, please reference the data set title or other identifying information in your correspondence. DOGAMI publications can be downloaded from http://www.oregongeology.org
Geologic mapping was supported in part between 2021 and 2022 by grants from the STATEMAP [http://ncgmp.usgs.gov/about/statemap.html]component of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program under cooperative agreement G21AC00647. Additional funds were provided by the State of Oregon through the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Care was taken to limit categorical attribute errors. Attribute accuracy of the database was visually inspected but despite the checks there may be some attributes that are still mislabeled.
Topology has been validated for the feature classes. Topology errors: 0. Topology exceptions: 4; MapUnitPolys must not have gaps 1 exception for project boundary of polygons; ContactsAndFaults must not have dangles 3 exceptions for faults. Duplicate point locations were found. No attempt has been made to correct the errors as they are related to multiple samples at one location, retesting of samples, and/or variance in Z values. Tests for logical consistency were performed by ArcGIS Topology software and GeMS Tools for Arc10.5 2018-03-04; Topology Check script and Validate Database script. All points, lines, and polygons were visually checked, and are labelled correctly.
Data collection does not include all possible traverses, measured sections, etc., and thereby is not complete. Not all field data were collected nor were all of the data compiled from lineage maps. Geologic concepts and definitions of map units are current. Density of observations is sufficient to support the map(s).
Data was collected and interpreted at a variety of scales. For field work, a combination of hillshade images from, DOGAMI's lidar 3 ft pixel bare earth DEM (approximately 1 point every 0.3 meters), NAIP imagery derived structure for motion (SFM) 5 m pixel bare earth DEM (approximately 1 point every 5 meters), and/or 10m pixel bare earth DEM (approximately 1 point every 10 meters) served as basemap(s). Precision mapping using, GPS, GIS, and the lidar imagery employed an application for the iPad, called iGIS. On the computer, line work was nominally drawn at a scale of 1:8,000. Also, geologic data was compiled from paper maps. Positional errors should be expected from input of digitized points and lines from paper maps and the errors that arise from georeferencing the paper maps (accuracy of content). Not all resources were tested to evaluate the degree to which these inaccuracies exist. Positional accuracy of geologic contacts, structures, and measurement points is influenced by the subjective judgment of the mappers or by interpretation of remotely sensed data (e.g., lidar). Therefore, the data user must consider the aforementioned methods of data collection and compilation in context of positional accuracy and understand that most lines and polygon boundaries are inferred based on geologic interpretations.
A combination of lidar 3 ft pixel bare earth DEM (approximately 1 point every 0.3 meters), structure for motion (SFM) derived 5 m pixel bare earth DEM (approximately 1 point every 5 meters), and/or a 10m pixel bare earth DEM (approximately 1 point every 10 meters) served as elevation model(s). Not all resources were tested to evaluate the degree to which these inaccuracies exist. Lidar-derived bare earth elevation model vertical accuracy is typically less than 1 foot.
Topology checks were performed on the GeologicMap feature dataset by, employing the Topology check script provided in the GeMS Tools for Arc10.5 version 1.6.14, and checking additional topology rules using Esri ArcGIS 10.7 for desktop. The Topology Check script in the GeMS toolkit provides additional checks for automation errors and geologic blunders. This script builds and evaluates an ArcGIS topology with these rules: no overlaps in ContactsAndFaults, no self-overlaps in ContactsAndFaults, no self intersections in ContactsAndFaults, no gaps in MapUnitPolys, no overlaps in MapUnitPolys, and all MapUnitPoly boundaries are covered by ContactsAndFaults arcs. Topology Check also evaluates node topology, summarizes the map units that bound ContactsAndFaults arcs, checks for duplicate point features, and identifies very small polygons in MapUnitPolys and very short arcs in ContactsAndFaults. Results of Topology Check should be taken with a grain of salt, as some issues flagged by this script may not be errors. In addition to the GeMS Topology Check the following are added topology rules checked for the dataset. Rule 1: ContactsAndFaults must not have dangles. Rule 2: Cartographic Lines must not self-overlap. Rule 3: Cartographic Lines must not self-intersect. Rule 4: Cartographic Lines must be single part. Lineage maps were used as base maps in the following manner: 1) to compare the mapping against previous work; 2) scribing geologic features, e.g., bedding, faults, and folds; and 3) reference materials.
When contacting DOGAMI about this data set, please reference the data set title or other identifying information in your correspondence. DOGAMI publications can be downloaded from http://www.oregongeology.org
This point feature class records locations of samples collected for geochchemical analysis, as well as the associated chemical analyses.
When contacting DOGAMI about this data set, please reference the data set title or other identifying information in your correspondence. DOGAMI publications can be downloaded from http://www.oregongeology.org
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, no warranty expressed or implied is made by DOGAMI regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
When contacting DOGAMI about this data set, please reference the data set title or other identifying information in your correspondence. DOGAMI publications can be downloaded from http://www.oregongeology.org